Compare and Contrast the Concepts of Durkheims Social Facts With Essay

Compare and Contrast the Concepts of Durkheims Social Facts With Webers bureaucratism - Essay ExampleWebers views were various, he unwaveringly opposed the idea that history had some ultimate end, and seriously doubted the possibility of human liberation through a favorableist revolution (Hughes et al, 2003 55). According to him, the organisational body-build of rationalisation is that of the Bureaucracy, and this too contributed greatly to the meaninglessness of modern life, with the individual becoming increasingly insignificant within the vast administrative structures. Weber perceived Bureaucracy as an iron cage resulting from industrialism, stifling unique human qualities in both socialist and capitalist societies.The two scholars differed in their purpose and approach to sociology. Durkheim elongate the study of science to the study of social facts, whereas Weber attempted to provide existing social studies with a better foundation. Hence, Durkheim consistently expressed hi s belief that social facts had distinctive properties which must be recognized in order to make the study of club more scientific. On the other hand, Weber did not open up a new field, his work treated old themes and known materials with a new precision and from the standpoint of new questions. Durkheims and Webers different definitions of social facts and their divergent sociological studies of religion reveal the differences in their perspectives (Bendix, 1989).Similarities in the work of the two social scientists include the fact that both Durkheim and Weber pertain to ways of anthropomorphising society, that is, they provide a human form to society. In their individual ways, they emphasise the knowledge that both Social Facts and Bureaucracy theories respectively, dominate lives and therefore society is seen as a living thing, as seen in the following comparisonDurkheim (1982) stressed that social facts cannot be defined by their universality, there may be different and disti nctive manifestations. They are general